Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Grossman, Briscoe among inactives

  1. #1

    Grossman, Briscoe among inactives

    http://dcprosportsreport.com/2012/09...ins-inactives/

    Redskins go with the two rookies at QB. Love it!

  2. #2
    Good news for Redskins? NO starting CB Jabrai Greer is inactive

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    303
    Grossman serves no purpose if he is going to be inactive. Pay him $ 1 million and let him be your QB Coach.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Crazy Horse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    299
    i think he's gone by week 8.

    "
    Originally Posted by redskin_rich
    Ranking Eagle fans that high is similar to putting possums or weasels at the top of the food chain. It makes no sense, because while they serve a purpose -- being the majority of road-kill, along with the skunk, they also take care of the above water bottom feeding, so to say. They are nasty to confront but cowards at heart and will usually hide or play dead when challenged

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    303
    He may be gone sooner than that. There are only 2 players you can make an argument (IMO) that Cooley should be brought back for, Grossman because he is an inactive 3rd string QB and Banks because he has gone 25 games by my count without scoring a TD from punts or KO but once again put the ball on the ground twice without making a big play. It looks like the risk with Banks outweighs the reward.

  6. #6
    Moderator SkinsGuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    1,174
    Quote Originally Posted by ISF View Post
    He may be gone sooner than that. There are only 2 players you can make an argument (IMO) that Cooley should be brought back for, Grossman because he is an inactive 3rd string QB and Banks because he has gone 25 games by my count without scoring a TD from punts or KO but once again put the ball on the ground twice without making a big play. It looks like the risk with Banks outweighs the reward.
    weren't you singing banks praises as a playmaker?? i for one would be absolutely fine if they left Banks go, let Paul return kicks and robinson/moss return punts . . .

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    303
    I was actually echoing the sentiment of Shanny for keeping him and I was trying to be supportive! I have never been comfortable with his small size and penchant for putting the ball on the ground.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •