
Originally Posted by
ISF
I don't think any of the debate is about replacing Gano, it's who they replaced him with. Cundiff was 1 of 6 from 50+ last year, Gano was 4 for 6 from 50+ last year. The differences in their respective success rates is statistically insignificant. Last year, Cundiff was rated the 31st best kicker in the league, Gano was 30th. Rackers was around 15. Rackers is the one they should have kept based on statistics.
The only advantage Cundiff has is on touchback %. But I submit, when has any team ever stated "If we had more touchbacks, we could have won the game!" or "Missing that last touchback really hurt us!"?
There is a logic in this move that escapes me.
And technically, Gano hits water about 75% of the time when falling off a pier, not including when he is caught (blocked) before hitting the water.
Bookmarks