Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 126

Thread: Redskins injury updates here!

  1. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by SkinsGuru View Post
    yeah . . . i blame Shanny for this . . . all the talk a few weeks ago was Shanny saying it was just a matter of pain tolerance . . . seems to me, even it it didn't worsen the problem, it did keep it from healing as quickly as possible . . . they should have shut him down completely until it healed then . . . so now we don't have a choice . . . keep him on the shelf until his is 100% as the offense is doing just fine without him and with him at 100% they will be down right scary . . .
    Agree 100%

  2. #72
    Leonard Hankerson is listed as probable. He is ill. Sav Rocca will be eligible to punt.

  3. #73
    Moderator SkinsGuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    1,177
    Quote Originally Posted by PennSkinsFan View Post
    Leonard Hankerson is listed as probable. He is ill. Sav Rocca will be eligible to punt.
    well . . . with all the byes on one of my fantasy teams i was going to play Hank . . . instead i inserted Josh Morgan . . . so the skins and i will need JM to do well . . .

  4. #74
    Davis done for the season.

    Fletcher appears ok. Slight hamstring pull, he said he just didn't want risk it.

  5. #75
    Junior Member Blog So Hard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    DMV
    Posts
    17
    Latest report on Garcon is that his injury is actually a torn tendon in his foot.

    From what I have read, recovery time could be 8-12 weeks from the initial injury. So he is out until at least after the bye week....maybe longer

  6. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by Blog So Hard View Post
    Latest report on Garcon is that his injury is actually a torn tendon in his foot.

    From what I have read, recovery time could be 8-12 weeks from the initial injury. So he is out until at least after the bye week....maybe longer
    Well that is news to me. a torn tendon? Umm isnt that something they could have found out earlier with an MRI but instead labelled it as a bruise? If it really is a torn tendon then that actually explains alot.

  7. #77
    Senior Member Crazy Horse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    300
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...fantasy-status

    We should put him on IR and sign another wr to take his place.signing him was another huge free agent cluster*uc*! they should at least try out a few wrs just to see what they could do and how they look.

    "
    Originally Posted by redskin_rich
    Ranking Eagle fans that high is similar to putting possums or weasels at the top of the food chain. It makes no sense, because while they serve a purpose -- being the majority of road-kill, along with the skunk, they also take care of the above water bottom feeding, so to say. They are nasty to confront but cowards at heart and will usually hide or play dead when challenged

  8. #78
    Moderator SkinsGuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    1,177
    Quote Originally Posted by Blog So Hard View Post
    Latest report on Garcon is that his injury is actually a torn tendon in his foot.

    From what I have read, recovery time could be 8-12 weeks from the initial injury. So he is out until at least after the bye week....maybe longer
    yeah . . . i read this a little earlier too . . . that really SUCKS . . . i hope them trying to play him a couple of weeks ago didn't push that time frame out too far . . .

  9. #79
    Moderator SkinsGuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    1,177
    Quote Originally Posted by Crazy Horse View Post
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...fantasy-status

    We should put him on IR and sign another wr to take his place.signing him was another huge free agent cluster*uc*! they should at least try out a few wrs just to see what they could do and how they look.
    Burress is still out there . . . any takers?? (one year rental)

  10. #80
    Nick Sundberg has been cleared to practice.

    Reality on receivers guys? Our offense is not struggling. Nor is the passing game. RGIII will get the ball to receivers, he hits a wide array. Unless Buress can play S or CB, I am not interested. That is where the problem lies.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •